Featured Post: Cultivating Legal Arguments: How Writing a Brief Is Like Planting a Seed
As attorneys, we often think of legal writing as a technical, precise process—and it is. But sometimes, it helps to step back and see our work through a different lens. Imagine, for a moment, that writing a legal brief is like planting a seed: it requires preparation, patience, and ongoing care to see it flourish.
Preparing the Soil: Setting the Stage for Your Argument
Just as a gardener prepares the soil before planting, an attorney must carefully select and organize the facts and law that will form the foundation of a brief. This means identifying the most relevant facts, understanding the legal issue, and framing the question in a way that speaks to the court. Like rinsing out harmful salts from potting soil, you must also clear your mind of distractions and assumptions, focusing only on what is essential and persuasive.
Planting the Seed: Crafting Your Argument
Once the groundwork is laid, it’s time to plant your argument—your seed. In a brief, this means clearly stating your position, supporting it with authority, and anticipating opposing arguments. The act of planting is deliberate and thoughtful: you must position each point carefully, just as a gardener places each seed in the right spot, ensuring it has the best chance to grow. The more care you take at this stage, the stronger your argument will be.
This step is about more than just stating your position; it is about strategically selecting and organizing your points so that they have the greatest impact.
- Clarity and Precision:
Just as a gardener chooses the best spot for each seed, you must be deliberate in how you introduce your argument. State your position succinctly at the outset. Avoid ambiguity; a well-defined issue helps the court understand exactly what is at stake.
- Supporting Authority:
Every strong argument needs the right nutrients—in legal writing, those are statutes, case law, regulations, and persuasive policy arguments. Carefully select the most relevant authorities and integrate them seamlessly into your narrative, much like enriching the soil around a seed.
- Anticipating Counterarguments:
A skilled gardener knows what pests or conditions might threaten a seedling. Similarly, they anticipate the opposing side’s strongest points. Addressing counterarguments early and thoughtfully can strengthen your position and demonstrate your credibility.
- Logical Structure:
Organize your brief so that each section builds logically on the last. This structure guides the reader through your reasoning, much like a trellis supports a growing vine. Make sure your argument flows naturally and persuasively.
Watering and Nurturing: Revising and Refining
A seed left unattended will struggle to thrive. Similarly, a brief is not finished after the first draft. You must return to it, revising and refining your arguments, just as you would water and tend to a growing plant. This process includes checking for clarity, eliminating wordiness, and ensuring your argument is tightly constructed. Over time, your brief will develop nuance and strength, much like a seedling that grows taller and sturdier with each passing day. This is how:
- Multiple Revisions:
Just as a plant needs regular watering, your brief benefits from multiple rounds of review. Each revision allows you to clarify your points, tighten your logic, and eliminate unnecessary language.
- Seeking Feedback:
Invite colleagues or mentors to read your draft and offer feedback. Fresh eyes can catch issues you might miss and suggest improvements, much like a fellow gardener might spot a wilted leaf or a pest you overlooked.
- Focus on Clarity and Conciseness:
Legal writing is most persuasive when it is clear and concise. During revision, look for ways to simplify complex sentences, remove redundancies, and ensure your arguments are easy to follow.
- Refining Your Tone:
The tone of your brief should be professional, respectful, and confident. Revising gives you the chance to adjust your tone, ensuring you strike the right balance between advocacy and objectivity.
- Checking for Consistency:
Ensure that your argument is consistent throughout the brief. Any contradictions or inconsistencies can undermine your credibility, just as neglecting a plant can stunt its growth.
- Final Proofreading:
Before submitting your brief, perform a final proofread to catch any typos, grammatical errors, or formatting issues. This step is like the last check before a gardener presents their work at a show—everything should be polished and ready for presentation
By approaching your legal brief as a living document that requires careful cultivation, you’ll craft arguments that are not only persuasive but also resilient and well-rooted in the law.
Watching It Grow: The Evolution of Your Argument
As your brief takes shape, you may find new angles, additional authorities, or better ways to frame your points. This is the growth phase—your argument is developing, becoming more robust and persuasive. The best briefs, like the healthiest plants, are those that have been nurtured over time, with attention paid to every detail.
This is the stage where your argument truly evolves, deepening in complexity and persuasive power.
- Incorporating New Authorities:
As you continue to research and refine your brief, you may discover additional case law, statutes, or secondary sources that support or sharpen your position. Integrating these new authorities can strengthen your argument, much like adding compost enriches the soil and helps a plant thrive.
- Exploring Nuance:
With each revision, you gain a clearer understanding of both your own position and the opposition’s. This allows you to address subtle distinctions and potential counterarguments, adding layers of nuance that make your brief more robust and harder to dismiss.
- Refining Analogies and Examples:
Over time, you may find better analogies or more compelling examples to illustrate your points. These refinements help the court visualize your argument and understand its significance.
- Responding to Peer Review:
Feedback from colleagues or supervisors can reveal blind spots or suggest new angles. Incorporating this feedback helps your argument grow in unexpected but valuable ways, similar to how a gardener might adjust care based on observations.
- Adjusting to Procedural Developments:
Sometimes, new facts emerge, or the court issues a ruling that affects your case. Your brief must be flexible enough to adapt, just as a gardener adjusts watering and pruning in response to weather changes.
- Developing a Cohesive Narrative:
As your argument evolves, it should tell a clear and compelling story. Each section of your brief should build on the last, creating a logical progression that guides the court to your desired conclusion.
- Strengthening Policy and Equity Arguments:
Over time, you may identify policy considerations or equity arguments that further support your position. Highlighting these can add depth and appeal to your brief, making it more persuasive to judges who value fairness and justice.
The Result: A Mature, Persuasive Argument. By the time your brief is ready for submission, it should reflect the cumulative effect of careful cultivation. The argument you present is different from the one you started with—it has grown, adapted, and matured. This process ensures that your brief stands up to scrutiny and has the best chance of achieving your client’s objectives.
Just as a gardener takes pride in watching a plant grow from a tiny seed into a thriving specimen, you can take pride in seeing your legal argument develop into a powerful, well-supported position.
Harvesting the Results: Presenting Your Brief
Finally, when your brief is ready, you present it to the court—the moment of harvest. Just as a gardener takes pride in the fruits of their labor, you can take pride in a well-crafted, persuasive brief that has been carefully cultivated from a single idea into a compelling legal argument.
The Gardener’s Mindset
Approaching legal writing with the mindset of a gardener can make the process more enjoyable and effective. It reminds us to be patient, to pay attention to detail, and to care for our arguments as they grow. It requires patience and persistence because growth takes time and continuous care. It requires attention to detail because you need to weed out weaknesses and prune for clarity. You need to adapt with flexibility so you can respond to change and learn from experience. Like a garden, you need vision and planning so you can strategically optimize. This mindset will reward you.
Whether you’re writing your first brief or your hundredth, remember: every great legal argument starts with a seed, and with the right care, it can grow into something truly impressive.
Notable LinkedIn Posts and Comments
- John Thorpe on best practices with “Reply all”
- Richard Tromans on Perplexity providing “Legal Help”
- Spencer May on how every “no” gets you closer to “yes”
- Melanie Kalmanson on the latest edition of The Blue Book
- Donald Patrick Eckler on how AI is getting both worse and better
June’s Cool (and Not Necessarily New) Tech Tool and Recommendation
Ideogram 3.0: Ideogram 3.0 is a major update to the text-to-image AI model, delivering significant advancements in photorealism, text rendering, and style control, making it highly effective for graphic design, marketing, and professional creative applications. It introduces a Style Reference feature, allowing users to upload up to three reference images to guide the model’s aesthetic output, and offers a vast library of 4.3 billion style presets for enhanced creative flexibility. The model excels in generating complex, accurate text within images and produces more realistic lighting, textures, and human representation than previous versions.
Podcast/Media of the Month
- Legal Workflow Lessons from the Factory Floor: Kanban for Lawyers Part 1, The Agile Attorney Podcast
Host John E. Grant discusses how the visual management systems pioneered by Toyota in the 1950s—specifically the Kanban method—can be adapted to improve modern legal practice. It traces Kanban’s evolution from using physical cards on factory floors to digital boards embraced by software developers in the late 1990s. The core idea is that visual systems, which helped Toyota streamline production and achieve global success, can also help law offices create more efficient workflows, reduce stress, and provide more reliable results for clients. Grant argues that these visual tools are especially well-suited for legal work, offering practical benefits for managing complex tasks and improving client outcomes.
Otto von Zastrow on MidPage.AI and the Future of AI-Powered Legal Research, The Geek in Review Podcast
Otto von Zastrow, CEO of MidPage.AI, discusses building an AI-driven legal research platform designed to rival legacy tools like Lexis and Westlaw. MidPage stands out with features such as smarter search, a proprietary citator, and Proposition Search, which helps lawyers quickly find relevant judicial language. The company’s unique “kangaroo court” process requires all employees to conduct legal research, fostering user empathy and continuous product improvement. By creating its own case law dataset, MidPage avoids dependence on incumbents and enables greater innovation. Otto predicts AI will empower lawyers to work more efficiently and maintain credibility as clients increasingly use AI tools themselves.
Law Journal Articles
“Friend or Foe? Generative AI and Legal Writing” (Peter Nemerovski)
Peter Nemerovski’s article examines generative AI’s abilities in legal writing, finding that while tools like GPT-4o can produce competent but not excellent legal documents, they excel at specific tasks such as summarizing opinions and revising text. He recommends that legal writing professors begin incorporating generative AI into their teaching, focusing on prompt engineering and critical evaluation of AI-generated work to prepare students for its growing role in legal practice. He highlights ongoing challenges and innovations in legal education and practice, from foundational legal systems and procedural barriers to the integration of advanced AI technologies.
AI-Powered Lawyering: AI Reasoning Models, Retrieval Augmented Generation, and the Future of Legal Practice (Daniel Schwarcz, Sam Manning, Patrick Barry, David R. Cleveland, J.J. Prescott, Beverly Rich)
Generative AI is poised to transform legal work, but concerns remain about its reliability, especially with complex tasks. This study tested two new AI innovations—Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) and advanced reasoning models—by having law students use them for legal tasks. Both tools significantly improved the quality and efficiency of legal work compared to older models, with RAG-based Vincent AI reducing hallucinations and the reasoning model o1-preview enhancing analytical depth but still producing some errors. The results suggest that combining domain-specific RAG with reasoning models could further advance AI’s effectiveness in the legal profession.
